Habitualization devours works, clothes, furniture, one's wife and the fear of war. "If the whole complex lives of many people go on unconsciously, then such lives are as if they had never been." And art exists that one may recover the sensation of life; it exists to make one feel things, to make the stone stony.
Viktor Shklovsky, Art as Technique
The critic Viktor Shklovsky's striking words a few months before the Russian revolution in 1917 were against the attrition of routine. He wished to reanimate what he thought he'd become too used to. Technique, device and the medium-specific in art were to be the methods: tactics to retrieve what he considered to be 'consciousness'. Well, it certainly came his way that October exactly a century ago.
Back in 1920s Europe, this idea of making the stone 'stony' sat very well with what others in the arts thought, too: German playwrights, Irish novelists and anglophile American poets, in particular. The ‘stony stone’ idea lies at the very corner of Russian formalism, almost a hundred years old now and so in a conventional way a modernist antique itself, quoted, loved and fetishized in subject readers, journal articles and studio outlines like this.
In fact, a century later, we locate much art now in an opposite way – alive exactly in the everyday, on the unnoticed margins of spectacle and sensation, temporary, jumbled and quiet. In what Iris Murdoch once called "the thingy world", objects must be allowed to have "all a life and being of their own, and friendliness, and rights". It's in such a spirit of companionship that the Making the Stone Stony studio acknowledges how our relationship with objects alters, once we think of them as things. And that's when the stuff of an art studio (wood, paint, stone, metal and clay) gets a life again, dons its glad rags to sashay back in through an art school’s doors.
To be clear, we're all for making things via their adjectives. Bottle, bottly. Lion, liony. Air, airy. Doesn't have to be material. That's how art might still recover the sensation of life from what we're all too used to... So stone is just a useful umbrella for the studio. This means we won't insist you chip away at any block, although we may well give you the opportunity at some point. This studio will therefore examine art strategies for allowing ‘things’ a life and being of their own. Whimsical, trivial, deadly serious.
You can be a painter, a sculptor, a video artist, a photographer or a printmaker – this studio welcomes everyone. We'll explore objets d’art, the everyday, live art and group work along the way. You propose an art project for the whole year, arising from or intersecting with the studio theme. You set that art project out with an aim and a purpose. You research your art project to university standards, using London as a study resource - its galleries, museums, libraries, art events and art archives.
Above all, in this studio we'll work as artists on making friends with ‘things’, outlining what rights a ‘thing’ might have. We’ll use our own interest in their context, their placement and their processes to make artworks with and from them. Knowing how to do this well is crucial to so many artists' careers as professionals.
This studio's art methodology is fairly simple. We'll start on the ground with some questions about aim and purpose. We shall set ourselves rules. We shall conduct field research. We shall make in all art media. We shall publish our findings. We shall display our art together.
The challenge for art students who join this art studio is as follows. To take what you have learned so far as an individual art student and to use this to learn more now in a group context, by applying those skills and that knowledge outside the art school in a more public way. You may then use this work as a springboard for further study.
Artists to look at
Nancy Holt, Mary Miss, Alice Aycock, Tania Kovats, The Chapman Brothers, The Harrisons, The Boyle Family, Adam Chodzko, Marcus Coates, Mark Dion, Robert Smithson, Walter de Maria, Ian Hamilton Finlay, Martin Creed, Simon Pope, Adam Chodzko, Becky Beazley.
- Bill Brown, Introduction to Thing Theory
- Annie Dillard, Seeing from Pilgrim at Tinker Creek
- Aldo Leopold, Thinking like a Mountain from A Sand County Almanac
- Val Plumwood, Being Prey from The Ultimate Journey
Studio Photo 01: The Subjective Eye
Ania Dabrowska and Mick Williamson
This photography studio concentrates on developing your professional practice within a fine art context, preparing you for your career within photography and the visual arts. Understanding the meaning of photographs beyond its immediate subject matter will help you to access the full power of the medium, where subject, author and audience come together.
Studio Photo 02: Beyond the Surface
Paola Leonardi and Heather McDonough
Beyond the Surface is a photography studio that shows you how to mix art with work and use your own contemporary imagery towards a career in photography. Get your aesthetic identity right - join this studio!
Studio Art 03: The Hole in the Screen
Patrick Ward and Jonathan Whitehall
The Hole and the Screen is a lively contemporary art studio focused on how negative space works in moving image in art theory and in art practice. Video, film, sound and photography all play their part. All-comers welcome!
Studio Art 04: Open Field
Ben Cain and Janette Parris
Open Field is a very special art studio dedicated to providing art students with hands-on work-related learning alongside artists as they undertake art residencies at the Cass. All Year 2 art students will pass through this studio for one of the residencies.
Studio Art 05: I Love Painting Things
Bob and Roberta Smith, Andrea Medjesi-Jones
This art studio is aimed at art students who want to paint! That’s any aspect of paint, not just formal work on canvas, but also painting sculptures, ceramics and using paint in performance. This is the one for you!